On Globalism

No one can deny that the world is becoming a smaller place, that developments in communications and transportation are bringing about a global union as more nations become interdependent upon others. I do not deny this and refuse to stick my head in the sand, as most conservatives do, and ignore this vital trend. Make no mistake about it; the world is indeed moving towards a global system.

I would point out, however, that there are several models of globalism  that can be adopted and the current one, as espoused by the United Nations and various humanist groups, like the World Federation,is not conducive to progress and productivity.

They may speak of the global village, but their version of globalism is a planetary redistribution of wealth from the Northern hemisphere to the Southern hemisphere. They do not believe in borders, or individual sovereign nations. They may speak of the global village, but in reality it is a global plantation they have in mind with them being the governing cabal.

Where the reactionary right makes its mistake is to assume the driving force behind the global plantation is leftist in scope. In reality the driving force behind this movement towards global unification is Ne0-Conservative in origin.  The New World Order boys are unbridled capitalists, not Marxist socialists. They want the world as one vast market for free trade, not one huge worker’s paradise.

I have a different vision. Call it a benevolent and progressive form of Neo–Fascism if you must, I care not. There is no doubt that independent nations are essential for any future global confederation. Indeed before this global confederation can be a reality, one must first have nationalistic revolutions through out the Western world. We must overturn both the reactionary right and the lunatic left and adopt third positionist philosophies. Only then by working together, and recognizing a common blood and heritage, can this future Western Alliance, this global confederation, be established. This future Western Alliance will not be based on global racial diversity, or social environmentalism, as is the United Nations,but an imperium of Western White nations, a new order for the ages, not to enslave man, or subject our race to the tyranny of mere numbers via global democracy, but to bring about a new renaissance of our people, a golden age, and to spread our seed among the stars to ensure we are not submerged in a sea of rapidly expanding non-white humanity.

What Determines A Nations Ability?

Is it institutions, as both liberals and conservatives allege? Are we free as a people because we have a Constitution? Then if constitutions grant freedom we should be able to apply the American experience anywhere on the globe and create free republics, with individual rights and limited governments, all over the planet! On this, both liberals and conservatives are in agreement. In this case both the reactionary right and the lunatic left are wrong, dead wrong!

The character of a nation depends upon the racial or genetic quality of its people. Moral, intellectual, artistic, and spiritual traits are just as distinctive and characteristic of different races as are head forms,hair, facial features, and physical stature.

It is the Anglo-Saxon (Germanic) heritage of its people that made America free, not a written constitution or a federal system of government or a free enterprise system. All of these are byproduct’s of Anglo-Saxon folkways. As America become less Anglo-Saxon, and more non-white it becomes less free , more chaotic, and a much less desirable place to live. Such would not be the case if freedom was merely derived from social concepts or institutions, as liberals and conservatives seem to foolishly believe.

Science Verses Liberalism.

Science says: human traits are heritable; that they are not distributed evenly in all populations; and that selective breeding changes the frequency of traits in humans just as it does in animals.

But liberalism says: human traits are controlled by the environment; that all groups have identical abilities; and that selective breeding may work in animals, but never with humans.

Ask yourself which is the most rational and logical of the two.

The Wisdom of Francis Galton

” As it is easy to obtain by careful selection a permanent breed of dogs or horses gifted with peculiar powers of running, or doing anything else, so it would be quite practicable to produce a highly gifted race of men by judicious marriages during several consecutive generations.”

Source: Francis Galton from the book Hereditary Genius, page 45.

H.G. Wells Quote

” Big business is by no means antipathetic to Communism. The larger big business grows the more it approximates to Collectivism. It is the upper road of the few instead of the lower road of the masses to Collectivism.”

Source: H.G. Wells, Russia in the Shadows, Chapter VII, The Envoy.

Patrick Henry on the Replacement of the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.

“My political curiosity leads me to ask, who authorized them to speak the language of We the People, instead of We the States? The Federal Constitution ought to have been amended the old system- for this purpose they were solely delegated…You must forgive the solicitation of one unworthy member, to know what danger could have arisen under the present Confederation, and what are the causes of this proposal to change our government?”

Well, Mr Henry, you were right! We have seen what has arisen. States are now mere provinces of the Federal levitation  and the Constitution gave the courts, and not the states, the power to decide what the Constitution means. Thus we have gun control, racial integration, homosexual marriage, abortion on demand, unlimited non-white immigration, homosexual adoption, thanks to the good ole Constitution and its unelected Judicial tyrants that struck down state law after state law forbidding the above listed practices!

Extinction by Gradualism

What is  abhorrent in one generation , is tolerated in the next , accepted in the third, and actively promoted in the fourth.

Racial intermarriage is now actively promoted by the government and media outlets in the good ole U.S of A.

Homosexual marriage and adoption is somewhere between toleration and acceptance by societal forces.

I wonder what form of degeneracy is waiting in the wings for the Judeo-liberal coalition to foist upon us next?

Francis Parker Yockey Quote:

” The mission of this generation is the most difficult that has ever faced a Western generation. It must break the terror by which it is held in silence, it must look ahead, it must believe when there is apparently no hope,  it must obey even if it means death, it must fight to the end rather than submit. Fortifying it is the knowledge that against the Spirit of Heroism no materialistic force can prevail…Ultimately nothing can defeat them except inner decadence.”

Hitler and Eugenics

The Eugenics movement originated in Britain and the United States; twenty -seven countries besides National Socialist Germany enacted eugenics legislation during this same period, and neither genocide, nor anything else dreadful happened in these countries; so no reasonable case can be made that eugenics always leads to genocide. Communists take the opposite view- that the environment has primacy over all and that genetics counts for nothing- yet they murdered far more people than ever is alleged for Nazi Germany.

 

If concern with racial improvement and Eugenics causes genocide, then it must also be argued that environmental belief, and egalitarian dogma, such as prevails in liberal and Communistic ideologies causes a much more horrific type of genocide, as more people have died In Stalin’s Russia that ever died in Hitler’s Germany!

Conservatives Devour Their Own!

Have you ever known liberals or Democrats to turn on each other and devour them? No, they stick together, no matter how outrageous a fellow Democrat might be!(After all Barney Franks (D. Mass) ran a homosexual escort agency out of his Congressional office! Could any conservative or libertarian ever get away with that?) Thats one reason  why Conservatives lose, they tear each other down. All the media has to do is accuse this or that person of racism, homophobia, sexism, or any other Ism the media has taught us to hate.

We are like the two minute hate from the novel 1984 in which Big Brother tells us who the enemy of the day is and we foam at the mouth and hurl vitriol at them! What we don’t realize is that the enemy KNOWS that the charges they often lob at political opponents are false, but they also know the right wing will always react like a bunch of Pavlovian dogs and devour its own. Thus do I call them the “reactionary right.” My problem with the reactionary right is they mistake blind obedience for patriotism and have no idea what true patriotism really is!

(Patriotism; from the Latin base word PATER meaning father. Thus patriotism, in its truest sense, is loyalty to a kindred stock. Its ethnic based, in other words)

Lets take Sean Hannity. He had a guest host on his nationally broadcast radio program that was foaming at the mouth because years ago Ron Paul put out a newsletter known as the Ron Paul Report that was endorsed by the American Nazi Party! It seems the lunatic left, and the reactionary right, like the followers of Sean Hannity, believe there is a large, monolithic Nazi party in America secretly planning world conquest. (I kid you not)

I ask, did said Party endorse his report or merely make it required reading? And if they did endorse his publication  how is that Ron Paul’s fault? Folks anybody that investigates Nazism in America will be vastly disappointed. There is no monolithic group. There are a bunch of tiny splinter groups filled with dysfunctional people that can be guaranteed to self destruct their own movement. Ive know whereof I speak. Ive known members of various groups!

Now, the real question is why has the media been silent about Obama’s Communist support? I can understand why the pro-Obama liberal (Really Judeo-liberal is a more descriptive term) media would like to sweep this under the rug, but why has the right wing been so quiet about this?

Folks; the Communist Party of the United States, or as they like to call themselves, the Communist party USA, (As if they are straight out of Maybury having just had tea with Aunt Bea and Sheriff Taylor, as American as apple pie!) They are well financed, with professional support among intellectual and college professors! They rent out expensive Manhattan hotels each year for their Party Convention. They have wealth and power that  the tiny Nazi organizations in America can only dream about. The Communist Party LOVES Obama and have endorsed him!  YOU DOUBT?

OK, lets look at their website.

http://www.cpusa.org

After all redistribution of wealth is a Marxist concept anyway and Obama is their baby boy!

Communism might be dead in Russia, thanks to the emergence of Russian Nationalism, (God Bless Putin) but its alive and well in America , usually masquerading as liberal progressives.